Thanet council has confirmed it is in talks with authorities in Belgium and the Seaborne Freight company which was due to have started a Ramsgate-Ostend ferry route in March this year.
Council leader Bob Bayford confirmed commercial talks have been taking place between the authority, Seaborne and Ostend representatives.
In October, during the run up to the Ostend elections, town mayor Johan Vande Lanotte announced a ‘basic agreement’ had been made for a ferry line between Ostend and Ramsgate.
He said the route would start with freight but a passenger service could begin shortly afterwards.
In a social media statement Mr Vande Lanotte said: “The Board of Management of the Port of Ostend has reached a basic agreement with Seaborne freight for the launch of a new RoRo line Oostende- Ramsgate, which is due to start on March 1, 2018.
“It is a guided freight, ie lorry drivers who cross the Channel with their freight. The intention is that three ships will be deployed with six departures a day.”
‘Set back’
This year Belgian press reported the expected start date for the operation had been set back.In February publication KW stated: “According to Vande Lanotte (pictured above), the agreement between Seaborne Freight and the Port of Ramsgate has not yet been signed. A start is now being made between mid-April and early May, but that depends on Ramsgate.
“The Ostend harbour also awaits the agreement with Ramsgate before making the necessary safety investments itself. These are necessary to prevent migrants in Ostend from getting on the ferry to England. “Both the operator and the port company will make the necessary investments.
“Ostend appoints ten extra police officers, who will be funded with a small 30% of the port duties that Seaborne Freight pays. The federal government also provides 16 additional people to the Shipping Police.”
‘Priority’
Thanet council confirmed no contracts have yet been signed and said discussions are being held with “several parties to consider the future of a potential ferry operation across various routes.”
Cllr Bayford said work on ferry operations is currently the priority for Ramsgate Port.
He said: “The right ferry operation under the right contract will start to plug the money pit that is currently Ramsgate Port.
“We want to do something about this and the quickest way is through a ferry operation. This would benefit Ramsgate and the whole of Thanet.
“Talks had been taking place a long time before I was involved, in fact Thanet council has been involved with ferry operation discussions for years.
“The ferry business is buoyant. We do not know what will happen after Brexit but we could end up doing more, or different, trade with Europe.”
Ferry route vessels
When asked by The Isle of Thanet News whether a suitable ferry was available for the operation the Ostend mayor said he ‘thought’ there was.
One vessel identified last year, out of the three proposed for the route, was reported to be the former Dover-Calais ferry MS Nord Pas de Calais.
The ship, built in 1987, served the route until 2011 when SeaFrance was liquidated. It was then bought by Eurotunnel and leased to MyFerryLink until 2015.
After 2015 it was laid-up and designated for use “for hazardous freight and waste”, before being renamed Al Andalus Express and sent to the Mediterranean.
Last month Mer et Marine (Maritime News) announced the vessel had returned to service after being chartered for two months by Naviera Armas to ensure the line between Las Palmas and Puerto del Rosario.
Maritime News added: “(It) is still one of the prospective ships for the proposed new connection between the Belgian port of Ostend and Ramsgate, in the United Kingdom. But this initiative, carried by Seaborne Freight, a structure created by former executives of MyFerryLink, has fallen behind.”
The two other vessels to be used are yet to be identified.
Seaborne Freight
Last year Mr Vande Lanotte told The Isle of Thanet News: “This group (Seaborne) is the first one that seems reliable to the port authorities of Oostende.”
Seaborne Freight is a UK company incorporated in April last year by marine consultant Roy Dudley.
This month (April) documents to Companies House revealed eight shareholders. There are 5,300 shares valued at 1p each – making a total of £53.
Thanet council’s shipping expert Robert Hardy,of Paradox Consulting, said last year that the cost of setting up a ferry business could be in the region of 8 million Euros (£6.9m), although estimates as high as £100million have been made.
He told Shipping TV: “It is not as hard as it looks. Once you have secured the burn money, probably in the region of 8 million Euros, depending on the vessel, you are up and running.”
Ramsgate Port
Ramsgate Port has been dormant, apart from a temporary deal with car shipper GEFCO between January 2016-17, since TransEuropa Ferries filed for bankruptcy in April 2013.
Thanet council was left with an unpaid debt of £3.4 million accrued by the ferry firm in port fees.
No ferry service has operated from the port since that date. The last successful operation was run by Sally Line Ferries. The company, founded in 1981, operated between Ramsgate and Dunkerque. Between 1993 and 1998 there was also a service to Ostend but this was moved to Dover and the Sally ceased operations in 1998.
GEFCO is currently using the port as an overspill when it is unable to unload at Sheppey. No new formal contract with TDC has been signed.
In January a proposal to use land at Ramsgate Port for a ‘temporary’ truck and coach park was approved.
The planning application, made by Thanet council’s harbour master Rob Brown, was for the fenced in area, previously used to park HGV’s which were either waiting to be shipped from or had arrived into Ramsgate by ferry, to become a 90-space truck park for a period of two years.
The need to make Ramsgate Port pay
Annual accounts by Thanet council for 2016-17 show a loss of £2.24million at Ramsgate Port.
Expenditure for the year was just over £3.2million compared to income of £970,000.
In 2015-16 the port had outgoings of £4,381,000 but its income was just £937,000.
Accounts for the years 2010/11 – 2015/16 showed the port had lost £7.6 million over those five years – excluding £5million in live export compensation and the £3.4million for bankrupt TransEuropa Ferries unpaid fees and charges
Thanet council said the figure included revaluation of assets, costs and depreciation – meaning the total stated amount has not actually been taken from council funds.
TDC said the money lost in real terms was £2.6million but annual audit papers show £7.6million due to ” strict accounting rules.”
TDC said the £7.6million figure included costs which are shared across other areas of the council for the running of its services, rather than being directly incurred in running the port.
Marina Village
Community backing has been expressed for a marina village development at Ramsgate Port and harbour.
It has been suggested boat-building and boat-repair. sailing schools water-sports, retail, residential and leisure facilities could be of economic benefit.
Although it has been suggested Thanet council would look at all potential options for the site if necessary the authority said “priority is to re-establish a ferry operation at Ramsgate.”
The harbour has been revitalised by leisure use of the Arches and income from areas such as mooring fees have resulted in a small profit of £558,000 for 2016-17.
Harbour expenditure was £1.5 million against income of just over £2million.
Accounts for the 2017/18 year will be publicly available after they have been audited in August.
Upcoming costs
Costs for the coming year will include £369,000 for general repairs and maintenance and £375,000 for specific capital schemes (which span over 2018-2022) for the port.
For the harbour the costs will include £299,000 for general repairs and maintenance and £2.01m for specific capital schemes (which span over 2018-2022.)
The costs include work on the harbour sluice gates and water supply upgrade; Replacement of Lead Lights at the port; fuel barge access ramp; Berth One refurbishment and pontoon improvements.
Competition
Dover is undertaking a £135m expansion project at the Western Docks which will include a new cargo terminal, waterfront development and marina. This is due to reaching capacity at the Eastern Docks.
A 24-month programme with dredging and piling activities is underway. Approximately one million cubic metres of silt, gravel and chalk will be removed. Works include extensive dredging and construction of a new 560m curved marina pier.
The Eastern Docks has two ferry operators running ships from Dover; P&O Ferries and DFDS Seaways. P&O operate ferries from Dover to Calais, while DFDS Seaways offers a service to both Calais and Dunkerque.
P&O also runs a freight service between Tilbury and Zeebrugge. The integrated ferry and logistics company carried 185,908 freight units between January and December 2017.
P&O Ferries operates two ferries on the route – the 20,000 ton sister ships Norstream and Norsky – sailing 24 times a week in total on crossings which last eight hours each.
8 port ‘proposals’ that are yet to come to fruition
October 2012
Euroferries announced it would be operating a 102m trimaran high speed service from Ramsgate by 2013.
2014/15
Euroferries again announced it would be launching a Ramsgate to Boulogne service. It had also approached Thanet District Council back in 2009. No service emerged.
Thanet council issued a statement to say: “Thanet District Council can confirm that there is no agreement with Euroferries Express ltd. to facilitate a cross-channel ferry service between Ramsgate and Boulogne.”
August 2014
Thanet council advised that talks were under-way with potential ferry operators with names touted including DFDS.
September 2015
Ferry expert Bill Moses said he planned to relaunch ferry services at the port
His plans were for an operator to carry up to 500,000 passengers by its second year of operation at Ramsgate.
November 2016
It was revealed that Thanet council had failed in a bid to get Government funding of £4.17million, to be matched with £2million from the authority, to carry out plans which could double lorry capacity at the port to one million vehicles a year.
A three phase expansion was planned.
The first phase was to improve the port’s handling capacity, particularly for unaccompanied freight vehicles, with a double deck ro-ro berth.
The second phase was the development of an on-port new alongside quay for the existing aggregates cargo and bulk cargo expansion and secondly an off-site freight logistics hub at Manston Business Park.
A third phase of seaward port expansion would have been dependent on demand.
The proposals reappeared in a report compiled by the East Kent Regeneration Board (EKRB) last August.
April 2017
The shipping expert taken on by Thanet council said the authority could buy its own ferry to run cross-Channel services from Ramsgate.
Robert Hardy, of Paradox Consulting, was one of the Ramsgate representatives who attended the industry Multimodal expo in Birmingham.
Talking to Shipping TV Mr Hardy said: “We have got to write a model as though we are starting our own ferry company. In fact I asked the question when I was brought in why don’t we buy the ferry, why are we relying on someone else to share our view?”
Thanet council later issued a statement to say:“The Port does not intend to either purchase or operate ships ourselves.”
April 2017
Beach schools, sea-themed playgrounds, a fish market and water sports adventure park were just some of the proposals for Ramsgate revealed at a public meeting.
The Port Ramsgate Maritime Village proposals were earmarked to be a part of Thanet council’s Local Plan – a blueprint for housing, business and infrastructure up to 2031 for the isle.
The Ramsgate maritime report was the work of community group Wish You Were Here with the meeting headed by Councillor Bev Martin and resident Helene Whitehall.
A maritime plan may still be on the cards – but possibly not this one.
August 2017
A tweet emerged ‘revealing’ Thanet council discussions with a Polish ferry company about bringing services to Ramsgate Port.
The council’s consultant Robert Hardy, who was taken on in April, was believed to have been in talks with Polferries.
The company is the largest Polish ferry operator.
No doubt, the economies of both Ramsgate and Ostend would benefit from this proposed ferry service. But there is a wider context. Dover is expanding its dock capacity but has no way of expanding the size of the roads serving the port.
Operation Stack already creates a nightmare of delay and frustration for all involved. But with Brexit requiring much more red-tape and paperwork for lorry drivers , as well as ordinary car drivers, the delays at the port in Dover will be horrendous.
Regardless of profit or loss to Ramsgate or Ostend, a sensible government would recognise the need to spread the load amongst a number of ports, not just squeeze it all into Dover. This should have been thought about at the time of the Referendum and the consequences spelled out. At very least, the government should be outlining plans to require drivers to use ports like Ramsgate and even Folkestone rather than Dover, and the cost of all this should fall on the taxpayer.At the moment, the government is pretending that all will be fine in 2019, and is ignoring the looming traffic crisis. Here in Kent, we will not be able to ignore it as we will face a permanent Operation Stack situation because of the paranoid demands for “harder borders”.
DO NOT allow Bill Moses any involvement whatsoever!
I personally experienced his handling of being appointed to Sally Line, along with many others……… maybe delve deeper, question some ex Hoverspeed staff on his “performance”.
Its a shame Silja line that owned Sally Line can’t return to Ramsgate as they still operate successfully from Helsinki.
The Silja line from Helsinki to Stockholm runs ferries that are mini cruise liners. Cabins down the sides, 12 decks, a nightclub, and a vast Atrium with shops and restaurants. That is the sort of ferry that would make the 4 hour crossing to Ostend a superior experience.
Three things that all of these proposals and discussions seem to ignore:
1: the crossing time in a conventional ferry from Ramsgate to France or Belgium will be typically 3-4 hours. Therefore not acceptable to most of the tourist traffic destined for northern France/Belgium/western Germany compared with time and frequency of crossings from Dover and Folkestone (Eurotunnel).
2: fast craft such as the Euroferries proposed catamaran are unsuitable for the seasonal rough water conditions in the Channel. Their capacity is limited and they are expensive to operate and maintain on such routes. Loading times are long due to the complex interior structure. They cannot operate 24/7/365 economically in these waters, seasonal operation is therefore not viable.
3: the driving time from Calais to Belgium is little more than 1 hour – so why would tourists choose to spend an extra 3 hours at sea unless there was a significant cost advantage.? Freight drivers might enjoy the rest period.
I keep thinking about this problem. I can remember all kinds of firms and crossings involving catamarans or hovercraft, Boulogne, Calais, Ostend, Ramsgate, Folkestone etc.
So many firms just gave up and declared it impossible to make it work, only for another firm to give it a (probably profitable) go until closing down in their turn.
But we have to realise that the Channel crossing is a real economic lifeline for this country. We can’t just shrug our shoulders when another good idea hits the buffers. We NEED ferry and rail crossings to function economically. (And I need an easy way to get to the Continent to enjoy my holidays!)
For once, (and I never thought I would ever say this!) I thought that Boris Johnson had a good idea with the Channel Bridge scheme. It is certainly possible from an engineering point of view as similar distances are bridged and tunnelled in Scandinavia and Japan and it is also economically viable as we have just spent a fortune bombing empty airfields in Syria , so the money is available if needed.
Even if the bridge idea is rejected, we may need to consider nationalising the ferries so that we can have guaranteed crossings that won’t go bust and close at the convenience of fly-by-night private companies. Who knows, there may be genuine reasons for many crossing ideas not being viable FOR A PRIVATE COMPANY. But we can’t leave such a vital resource to the whims of the private market. After all, we wouldn’t expect to be turned away from an NHS hospital and told “Sorry, we know your life depends on this procedure, but Bloggs Health PLC can’t make a profit from it”. Maybe we have to accept that something as vital as our main trading lifeline is too important NOT to be nationalised.
With TDC’s track record for business disasters, I worry that the ferry they are now considering bringing to Ramsgate, is the same one in the Mediterranean that has a history of mechanical failure.
I am very surprised that there is nothing about purchase or chartering ships to seborne.There are nothing markedet about the service.
So it will take many months before they can start
Another disappointment then. No sign of it happening. It’s getting like Brexit. Sold as good idea, but once we get down to the actual details, the long delays start. At least with this ferry idea, we can just let it drop with no damage done. With Brexit, we are stuck with a decision made 18 months ago and nobody has the bottle to just suggest we drop it.