Thanet has the highest child poverty rates in Kent, and the south east, according to new data released by The End Child Poverty coalition.
According to the report Thanet has some 10,500 under 18s living below the poverty line, equating to 34.7% of the isle’s youngsters. But when individual wards are looked at the rate is as high as 52%.
The data shows Cliftonville West as the hardest hit ward with 1,513 youngsters in poverty (after housing costs), equating to more than 52%. Next highest was Margate Central with 747 children in poverty, equating to 46.70% and then Newington with 777 children in poverty, equalling 46.96%.
At the other end of the scale is Cliffsend and Pegwell with 125 – 15.09% – and Kingsgate with 56 children – 15.46% – judged as in poverty although age demographics of those living in these wards will have impacted those figures.
Labour county councillor in Thanet Karen Constantine says measures must be taken to stop families plunging into poverty.
She says Universal Credit needs to be halted and county funds should be channelled into helping poorer pupils in schools.
She said: “This is utterly repugnant to me and should be to all Thanet’s residents. All children should have an equal chance. Child poverty scars and hurts for life. As it stands the UK has amongst the worst child poverty rates in the EU, and nationally it is set to grow by a shameful 1 million more kids in poverty by 2020. How can the 6th richest nation stomach this?
|Local Authority||Total number of children in poverty||% of children in poverty 2017 (after housing costs)|
|Tonbridge and Malling||4,922||17.84%|
“How can KCC continue to deny and disguise the abject poverty in Thanet. I’ve written again to Kent County Council leader Paul Carter and Matt Dunkley, Director Children, Young people and Education, to call for clear plans to halt and reverse this appalling situation. We need a clear, funded, and strategic plan of action with specific targets for the poorest areas, especially Thanet.
“We need to stop any further introduction of Universal Credit as this is an engine of poverty. We need to re-implement Labour’s Innovative tax credits that powered a reduction in child poverty.
“We need a comprehensive expansion of Sure Start centres and to stop any closures or reduction of services in Sure Start centres.
“We also need to stop sending homeless families out of area, only to bring them back into area months later. This practice exacerbates poverty meaning the poorest families, and their children have to spend more of their meagre income to stand still.
“We need to better manage county funds to recognise that poverty must be tackled systematically. Measures could include more provision of teachers and teaching assistants, free school meals, bursaries for travel for secondary school age pupils, provision of IT equipment.”
Matt Dunkley, director for children, young people and education, said:“We recognise child poverty is a growing problem, both nationally and in Kent and that this presents a significant challenge.
“We have responded creatively by forming new partnerships, reshaping services and adopting new ways of working to ensure disadvantaged children and families, including those in poverty, are supported where and when they need help.
“The council recently integrated all of its children’s services into a single Directorate, to create a more effective, coherent whole system approach to supporting vulnerable children and young people.
“Disadvantaged vulnerable learners are one of our strategic priorities. Our Vulnerable Learners Strategy brings together all the actions we are taking to improve outcomes for these children. It is designed to ensure that no child or community in Kent is isolated or left behind.”
Since the introduction of the benefit freeze, the End Child Poverty coalition, which includes charities, faith groups and unions, has warned that as prices rise, low income families would find it increasingly hard to pay for the same basic essentials.
The coalition is calling on the Chancellor to end the freeze on children’s benefits – currently in place until the end of the decade – so that families no longer see living standards squeezed as prices rise.
The group is also concerned that the impact of poverty may be exacerbated by a poverty premium – which means that low income families can face paying as much as £1700 per year more than better off families, to buy the same essential goods and services. A major contributor to this is the high cost of credit for low income families, and the coalition wants to see the Government address this by providing better access to interest free credit.
How the calculations are made
A child is calculated as living in poverty if they are in a family living on less than 60% of median household income. According to the latest official statistics 60% of median income (after housing costs) was around £248 per week.
To find the relevant poverty line for a particular household type, this then needs to be adjusted to take account of household size. For a couple with two children under 14 this means multiplying by 1.4 – giving a poverty line of £347 per week.
It is estimated that as many as 380,000 children in the South East are living in poverty.
This is disgusting, and this Tory Government is to blame for this. The local Tory MP’s are useless and not bothered either, all they can think about is flipping Manston airport, bloody Royal Yachts and bells that don’t ring in the night at Sandwich. It’s about time the local Councillors other than Labour and Thanet residents groups got up and started doing something about this mess.
Meanwhile, we are being taxed up to the eyeballs to pay millions in interest back on money borrowed from the banksters.
And yet this area returns TWO Tory MPs , has a UKIP Council, and was the area chosen by Nigel Farage to stand for election. So a lot of local voters are turning their backs on their own neighbours and leaving them to struggle.
Absolute nonsensee. Look at the criteria for determining poverty. It’s nothing to do with whether you have a roof over your head, food on the table or clothes on your back.
Because of the definition – the more families with an income above, say, £100,000 pa., the more families are deemed to be in poverty because the whole system is based merely on average incomes. So the more millionaires we have, normal income families are deemed to be poverty stricken . . .
This takes me back to secondary school maths. There can be a big difference between “median” and “average”. If poverty was measured by average incomes , then, yes, a few really well-off billionaires would skew the figures to make our overall incomes look pretty good. But the median figure ends up roughly in the middle of what MOST of us get, which is a much lower amount than an average of ALL incomes.So, for the purposes of this poverty calculation, we have to think of what most working-class people are getting these days, calculate an average of THAT and then imagine trying to live on 60% of it or less. Not a happy prospect, and it’s getting worse.
Kent Tory answer, cutbacks on funding thanet Surestart’s, if tories policies worked why does thanet with 2 Tory mps and so many Tory councillors not booming