Last chance to comment on changes to stroke services at QEQM

Campaigners want to see stroke services retained at QEQM

A campaign group aiming to save stroke services at Margate’s QEQM Hospital is urging people to get involved in the last few days of consultation, to push for an extension and to challenge the options on the table.

Health chiefs want to create three hyper acute stroke units for Kent and Medway.

A shortlist of options for the specialist units lists only the William Harvey Hospital in Ashford for east Kent.

The NHS in Kent and Medway – which includes all 8 Clinical Commissioning Groups – Bexley in south east London and the High Weald area of East Sussex have been consulting on the proposals.

The consultation closes at midnight on Friday (April 20).

The NHS says hyper acute stroke units will reduce deaths as each will have a multi-disciplinary team of specialist stroke clinicians, seven days a week caring for patients in the critical first 72 hours.

But Thanet campaigners say isle lives will be at risk because of journey times to Ashford.

Members of Save Our NHS in Kent (SONIK) say the Ashford hyper acute stroke unit (HASU) plan is the worst option for Thanet.

They are pushing for an extension to the consultation and are fighting to put QEQM on the table as a HASU site.

Doctor Coral Jones (pictured above, on right, with a fellow campaigner), spoke at a meeting of Westgate Town Council last week.

She said: “QEQM Hospital to Ashford is 60 minutes and that’s without accidents, other hold ups and a possible ambulance wait of up to 18 minutes.”

She added other options, including QEQM, Maidstone and Ashford hospitals, served the entirety of Kent – with every area of Kent able to get to a stroke unit in under 60 minutes – but claimed these had been dismissed.

She fears the final choices are driven by a need to service the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) debt in hospitals in Dartford and Tunbridge Wells.

She also claims there will be a downgrading of the QEQM Hospital.

SONIK spokesperson Carly Jeffrey

SONIK campaigner Carly Jeffrey said: “The problem with this plan is that there is no evidence that it will work and be safe for those with longer journey times. The whole county is being pushed towards a non-evidence based experiment on the people of Kent in which 3 hospitals will lose their stroke units.

“Save Our NHS in Kent believe NHS bosses should never have made the seemingly positive claims that underpin this consultation, and now we are going to hold them to account for it.

“People are concerned about what this means for other services such as A&E, and that is a reasonable concern.

“The two are tangled together. It’s rather peculiar and gives the impression that these consultations are just theatre, and that the decisions have already been made. There are also plans afoot nationally to reduce drastically the amount of hospitals that provide acute care. It’s hard not to see all these things as part of a larger plan to make district general hospitals a thing of the past.”

Dr David Hargroves

Dr David Hargroves, Clinical Lead for Stroke Medicine at East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, says the HASU proposal will save lives.

He said: “I am firmly convinced, as services are currently configured, that Ashford is the right place for the proposed east Kent hyper acute stroke unit, and that it will reduce deaths and long-lasting impairments for the people of Thanet, as well as the wider population of east Kent.”

A spokesperson for the Kent and Medway stroke consultation said: “No decisions have yet been taken about the future of urgent stroke care. We have been consulting across Kent and Medway to hear what people think. We’ll be carefully considering everyone’s views before taking any decision about next steps later this year.

“There is really clear evidence for hyper acute stroke units. They are recommended by the National Clinical Stroke Guideline, which sets out best practice for the NHS in England, and was developed by the Royal College of Physicians based on the evidence of what achieves the best outcomes for stroke patients both in this country and around the world. It has a full list of sources and bibliography setting out the research used in the drawing up of the guideline.

“Stroke staff currently work extremely hard but our services are not consistently meeting national standards and we need to change how stroke services are organised across the county.

“While the options that have been consulted on would mean longer travel times for some people, we expect our proposals to reduce the time between people having their stroke and starting specialist treatment. We believe our proposals would help people get the best possible care during the critical first 72 hours following a stroke, bringing our services in line with the best in the country.

“To draw up the shortlist that went out to consultation, 13 options were evaluated, including seven which had QEQM as one of the sites for a potential future hyper acute stroke unit. The evaluation panel included stroke consultants, nurses, and other staff, and they, along with the Stroke Review Programme Board, assessed the quality, accessibility and feasibility of potential options. The existence of the Private Finance Initiative funded hospitals in Kent played no part in the decision about which options went through to the shortlist.  Our proposals would be supported by a £40million investment in stroke services and are not about making cuts.

“As evidenced by the centralisation of other services in Kent, such as trauma and treatment for heart attacks, which have been in place for many years now, moving a specialist service from one hospital to another does not negatively impact other services like A&E.”


SONIK campaign

For more information on the SONik campaign go to [email protected]

Sign the SONIK petition


Find out more about the consultation and complete the survey by visiting


  1. If the people of thanet let the stroke centre close then this will be the start to the closure of the whole of the QEQM .

  2. Air ambulances were introduced to get people to hospital quicker. They now want to move the hospitals further away. Looks like attempted murder..

  3. This action of “moving” the Stroke Unit to miles away… is about the most ridiculous thing to happen in Thanet I have ever come across! A drive to Ashford or Medway can take hours. (this happens to me and many others nearly every day)(traffic on our roads is already greatly burdened).
    Why can’t they just leave things alone… QEQM has a very high popularity rate, and not many complaints are heard on the area, in fact, reports to the contrary are significant.
    Sorry, I just cannot understand the mentality behind this suggestion! PLEASE, LEAVE THINGS ALONE! They are working just great!

  4. Again Hargrove states Ashford is in east Kent, how can you believe anything he says, he thinks and acts like a dictator who dismisses the electorate as an irritant.

  5. There’s still time to make your views heard! Respond by emailing [email protected] before midnight on Friday 20th and cc [email protected], make sure your friends and family have all responded. The number of hospitals in Kent that treat strokes is currently 6; they want to reduce that to three for all of Kent. There’s NO EVIDENCE that this brings about better outcomes in an area like Kent, it is an experiment on the people in our county, and we must resist it. Please email or write a letter to your local MP – you never know they might be willing to oppose this, as the feeling in Thanet is so overwhelmingly against the proposed stroke review plan. The NHS bosses tell us it is an improvement, but we can see that it’s not the case. Keep fighting!

Comments are closed.