The ban on bailiff evictions has been extended, Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick announced today (February 14).
The ban – which was introduced at the start of the pandemic – has been extended for another 6 weeks until 31 March, with measures kept under review in line with the latest public health advice.
Exemptions remain in place for the most serious circumstances that cause the greatest strain on landlords as well as other residents and neighbours, such as illegal occupation, anti-social behaviour and arrears of six months’ rent or more.
The measures are part of a package of support the government has provided to protect renters from the economic impact of the pandemic.
Landlords are also required to give 6-month notice periods to tenants before starting possession proceedings, except in the most serious circumstances, meaning that most renters now served notice can stay in their homes until at least August 2021, with time to find alternative support or accommodation.
For those renters who require additional support, there is an existing £180 million of government funding for Discretionary Housing Payments for councils to distribute to support renters with housing costs.
Housing Secretary, Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP said: “We have taken unprecedented action to support renters during the pandemic including introducing a six-month notice period and financial support to help those struggling to pay their rent.
“By extending the ban on the enforcement of evictions by bailiffs, in all but the most serious cases, we are ensuring renters remain protected during this difficult time.
“Our measures strike the right balance between protecting tenants and enabling landlords to exercise their right to justice.”
Court rules and procedures introduced in September to support both tenants and landlords will remain in place and be regularly reviewed, with courts continuing to prioritise cases, such as those involving anti-social behaviour, illegal occupation and perpetrators of domestic abuse.
The government has also launched a new free mediation pilot to support landlords and tenants to resolve disputes before a formal court hearing takes place. This will help tenants at an early stage of the possession process.
Applications to the courts for possession by private and social landlords were down 67% between October and December 2020, compared to the same quarter in 2019. The number of repossessions recorded October to December 2020 was down 93% compared to the same quarter in 2019. Only 548 repossessions were recorded between April and December 2020 compared to 22,444 in the same period in 2019.
A tricky one.
Putting aside the rights and wrongs of buy-to-let, there are probably many many pensioners who’ve used their lump sums to buy a house in order to let it out to tenants. Folk might still be paying mortgages, or have other outgoings. It’s great that tenants, falling on hard times because they’ve lost their jobs due to CV, but what protection is there for the pensioner-landlord, who now perhaps has to rely on a state pension for their sole income?
So long as the government guaranteed rents upto the level of local housing allowance it would be perfectly reasonable, but they won’t. So that even those in receipt of benefits could effectively choose not to pass on the housing element with little sanction. So state sponored fraud/theft. Fortunately though it seems that there are not many that are that dishonest.
The extension also applies to commercial premises.
Won’t someone please think of the pensioner-landlords! I’ve heard it all now.
But surely it can’t be right that a landlord has to continue providing the service even when the tenant won’t pay. Be handy if it was made law that Sainsbury’s still had to provide your weekly shop even though you wouldn’t be paying for it for the next 6 months.
lots of unpaid rents
Then think about the Cliftonville man relying on getting rent from a second home to live on himself whose tenant hasn’t payed for 11 months because she says she is saving to buy her own house.
Does he have to lose his home before the court will hear the case?
No justice here – just an incompetent court system.