Kent police commissioner backs Government plans to criminalise unauthorised caravan sites

Plans for three Thanet temporary pitches

Kent’s Police and Crime Commissioner, Matthew Scott, has backed Government plans to criminalise trespass.

The Home Office has launched a consultation on giving police new powers to arrest and seize the property and vehicles of trespassers who set up unauthorised caravan sites.

PCC Matthew Scott

Mr Scott believes these changes would make it easier for swift and robust action to be taken.

He said: “I travel all over Kent speaking to residents and I know all too well the deep frustrations our local communities have with existing legislation. Giving local police officers the power to arrest trespassers and seize their property and vehicles would, in my view, better protect our communities.”

Amendments to law

Currently such trespassing is defined in law as a civil matter. But the Home Office is consulting on making it a criminal offence.

Home Secretary Priti Patel said: “Unauthorised encampments can cause misery to those who live nearby, with reports of damage to property, noise, abuse and littering.

“The public want their communities protected and for the police to crack down on trespassers. Our proposals aim to ensure these encampments can be challenged and removed as quickly as possible.”

The Home Office is proposing to broaden the categories of criminal trespass to cover trespassers who enter onto any land without permission of the occupier with the intention to reside.

The proposed amendments to the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 include: lowering the number of vehicles needed to be involved in an unauthorised camp before police can act from 6 to 2; giving the police powers to direct offenders to sites in neighbouring local authorities. Currently they can only direct trespassers to sites in the same area; allowing officers to remove trespassers from camping on or beside a road and increasing the time – from 3 months to a year – during which offenders are not allowed to return to a site they have already been removed from.

The Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) says it has made nearly £2 million available to councils to crack down on illegal developments, with funding also available under the £9 billion Affordable Homes Programme to help develop authorised sites.

Thanet situation

Thanet has experienced a growing number of unauthorised camps over the past three years. In 2013 just two incidences were reported but last year there were more than 50 and that number has been repeated this year.

A proposal is being made by land owners Blinkbox, which has directors in Canterbury and Ramsgate, and Joseph Jones of the Gypsy Council for a permanent site to be created at land by Minster Services,.

Mr Jones (pictured), 67, says the aim is for the site to accommodate between nine and 15 vans, through three permanent and seven transient pitches, with associated facilities. The arrangement will be to take a 99 year lease on the land. It is expected a decision on the planning application will be made in December.

He said: ““What we are proposing will not cost the taxpayer a penny. We have people in housing who do not want to be in housing and since 1968 Thanet has not provided a site.”

‘Devastating impact’

Speaking out about the Government consultation, a Friends Families and Travellers spokesperson said: “We completely oppose the Home Office announcement of a consultation on criminalising trespass. It is clear that the proposals would have a devastating impact on Gypsy and Traveller communities, who have been part of British life since before the 16th century, yet face some of the greatest inequalities of any group in England and Wales.

“The Home Secretary’s assertions that unauthorised encampments “cause misery to those who live nearby, with reports of damage to property, noise, abuse and littering” focus on the behaviour of a minority, yet tar all Gypsies and Travellers with the same brush.

“This is dangerous and discriminatory rhetoric. If property damage, noise, abuse and littering truly are the Home Office’s concerns, we know that there already exists reams of criminal law to prevent and punish this.

“It is no coincidence that this announcement comes in the wake of a general election. If there was a real appetite to address the issue of unauthorised encampments, the government would have invested in site provision. Yet, for over a decade we have seen little to no progress in this area. Criminalising families who have no place to go is inhumane and wrong.”


  1. This sounds very promising and could work with the lower amount of vehicles being cut to 2 and the re-enter ban being extended to 1 year from the same area/site. I know the site proposed for the Gypsies / traveller’s is not welcome by quite a few residents and is very close to a major road and the safety of children and vehicles having an accident I hope this will be taken into consideration and if permission for the site to be used suitable boundary wall and entrance /exit is put into place for the safety of all.

    • So what exactly do you suggest they do? You support criminalising them off they park illegally butt you don’t want them to have a legal site they are trying to sort out for themselves. There people too blame for this situation are three Tory government off the 1980s who removed the requirement for councils to provide legal sites for travelers to use. Before then there were no problems. Make it a requirement for councils too provide suitable pitches again that the East to solve there problem. Not turning people trying too follow their heritage and tea traditions into criminals

      • Swithin I think you have miss read my post. I believe that every council throughout the country should provide at least one site for gypsies /travellers. My concern is safety as it is so close to a major road and we know children can easily run into roads and not all driving is up to being that great. And yes I also think that if they trespass as they do it should be made easier to move them of the land they are on. One thing for sure is I’m not anti gypsy I have friends who are and have been since my school days and one of the families lives in margate. It is possibly the way I wrote it. And your right about the government in the 1980s I remember that there was a act that each council should provide a minimum of 5 spaces with water electricity and gas where I used to live the council did not have to do this as we already had 4 sites / areas with 28 families on them and we all got on together. We have the space in thanet to have two sites there is only one thing stopping it it is peoples prejudice towards them. Chris

  2. at last lets hope this law comes into practice asap in this age we do not want theses people who cause mess and are an unhealthy blot on the landscape we should get tough with these communities as crime follows them like their lifestyle

    • Trespassing is a civil, not a criminal, offence.
      So, if someone turns up uninvited on your land and won’t go when told, you can’t just dial 999 and expect the police to do something, because they won’t.
      You’ll have to go to court, and get a court order. If you serve the court order, and they still won’t go, then they’re in contempt of court, and that is a criminal offence, and the police will turn up.
      This proposed legislation will make it much easier to get the police involved.

  3. Any such law making trespass a criminal offense will not only affect Travellers but every one in England. Parking on double yellow lines? Trespass? More samples of this can be cited. To access some public land you have to cross a little trac of private do so under this proposal would beva criminal act.

  4. Sites are already available. They’re called camp-sites and you have to pay to use them. We all have to pay taxes/mortages/rents to live in our homes. Why should we subsidise others to live cost free?

Comments are closed.