MP Craig Mackinlay calls for more time on Local Plan at Prime Minister’s Questions

Craig Mackinlay at PMQs

South Thanet MP Craig Mackinlay called on Prime Minister Theresa May to give Thanet more time to salvage its Local Plan today (February 7).

The MP raised the issue at Prime Minister’s Questions asking that the government give Thanet “as reasonable time as necessary, perhaps under a new administration, to get our Local Plan right”.

However Prime Minister, Rt Hon Theresa May MP said in response: “My Hon. Friend is right to raise this matter on behalf of his constituents. I understand that, actually, Thanet District Council has not adopted a Local Plan since 2006 and that’s why my Rt. Hon. Friend the Housing Secretary has written to the District Council to begin the formal process actually of considering intervention.

“This is a very serious step which shows that the local Council has not been doing what it should be doing in relation to a Local Plan so my Rt Hon Friend the Secretary of State is now considering whether to intervene and he will be making an announcement in due course.”

The South Thanet MP’s demand came in the wake of the voting down of the publication stage of the plan at full council on January 18.

It was voted down by 35 councillors against, with 20 in favour. A change of status for Manston to a mixed-use designation to include 2,500 homes proved the downfall of the plan. An amendment to defer for two years the mixed-use designation pending the resolution of the DCO process was not sufficient to persuade the majority of councillors.

There were also issues over housing numbers with a strong campaign to protect sites mounted by the Birchington Action Group Against TDC Local Plan members.

The move has triggered possible intervention by the government.

Mr Mackinlay said: “I have been saying for as long as anybody will listen that Thanet with Manston for aviation is a wholly different Thanet from one without. The timings of the Local Plan and with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government pushing for completed Local Plans across the country adds to complications, but ideally, we need a Plan of two halves – a short-term plan for the next few years, and then a longer plan thereafter once the Manston issue is finally decided and settled.

“The Prime Minister gave a clear signal that Thanet’s Local Plan needs to be completed – I agree with her. It is my view that with political will it can be completed within an agreed timescale, maintaining Manston’s designation for aviation use and with the 2,500 houses and other ‘mixed use’ earmarked for the site in the flawed plan simply taken out.”

The question at PMQ can be viewed here.

Thanet District Council has also today reissued a call for further isle sites to allocate land for the plan.

The authority has told the Secretary of State Sajid Javid there will need to be a review of previously submitted, and new, sites; fresh reviews of supporting documents and new reports to council committees.

A letter from Chief Executive Madeline Homer to the Secretary of State adds that there now needs to be identification of sites to take the 2,500 homes ‘displaced from the airport site’ plus, possibly, a further 3,090 homes earmarked for the isle if new government calculations are applied.

The authority says this could take between 8-10 months with the intention to publish a pre-submission draft plan by December 2018 with the plan being submitted for examination by April 2019.

Any land submission should be made using the online form, which can be found on the council’s planning consultation website

This sets out the information needed to consider submissions. If you are not already registered on the consultation website, you will need to do that before submitting your site(s). A copy of the assessment form is also available to view online.

A separate submission should be made for each site.  An Ordnance Survey map extract clearly identifying the site will be required to accompany the submission.

If it is not possible to return submissions electronically, a copy of the form can be obtained from the Council’s Strategic Planning Team. Hard copy submissions should be sent to the Strategic Planning Team at Thanet District Council, PO Box 9, Margate, CT9 1XZ.

Sites identified will be assessed in relation to future development needs through the Local Plan process. It is important to be aware that sites brought to our attention will not necessarily be considered suitable or allocated for development.

Submissions should be received by 5pm on Friday, March 16.

If your site already has planning permission, there is no need to submit a site through this process.


  1. Donkey-joti y Sancho Panza (The Men of La Manston)

    I see the double act continues with Sancho opening his “big mouth” again (his own admission – see previous news post) this time in Parliament. From the report he was given short shrift by the Prime Minister and rightly so.

    The local double act continues to pile on the pressure to have their way by highlighting Manston as part of the failure by TDC to agree the LOCAL PLAN (housing development). This diatribe is ignoring the local residents of MANSTON; RAMSGATE; ACOL; St NICHOLAS; MINSTER and HERNE BAY the local people who definitely do not want a NOISY; POLLUTING Airport operating throughout the DAY and NIGHT anywhere near them.

    If Manston is not used for housing then watch out Birchington!!! Donkey-joti says there is plenty of room place the 2500 house plus the extra few thousand in a village near you!!

    I am sure we would all prefer a development for Manston that has health; schooling and sporting facilities that are apparently proposed by the developers.

    I can only hope the Secretary of State can see through this thinly vailed political ruse.

  2. The Prime Minister made it quite clear. TDC has screwed up by failing to put in place a Local Plan, and now we must face the consequences.
    TDC have no “special circumstances”. As the first council to fall foul of the requirement to publish, it’s highly likly that action will be taken by the Secretary of State as an example to other tawdry councils.

  3. Having a long delay might seem reasonable if the local UKIP/Tory Council can’t get its act together even though they all seem to have the same far-Right beliefs. So what about a much longer delay until their pet scheme,Brexit, is sorted out? Again, the Tory/UKIP thinkers can’t seem to agree about the right approach so why not kick that idea into the long grass as well?

  4. It was the Conservatives councillors who voted unanimously to reject publication of the plan. Now, the Conservative MP is grovelling in the House of Commons and begging the Conservative Secretary of State for more time; this despite knowing full-well that the SoS had previously warned the council that more time was not on the table. So, we seem to have Conservatives running around like headless chickens, trying to sort out the mess that other Conservatives have created. The whole morass has been caused by Conservatives. So, why on Earth would anybody trust them to sort it out?

Comments are closed.