Anger at council decision on 250 homes at Nash Road

The site

The decision to ‘defer and delegate’ approval to officers for 250 homes at Nash Road in Margate has provoked anger amongst objectors.

The application  for houses by St Gregory’s school and Salmestone Grange has been submitted by Piper Developments Ltd. The proposal is for 45 x 1 and 2 bed apartments, 65 x 2 bed 110 x 3 bed and 30 x 4 bed homes. 75 of the properties will be “affordable” homes.

The application also outlines road changes with the:

* Provision of new link road between Nash Road and Manston Road, with new roundabout on Manston Road for access into the site (and new service road for properties on Manston Road) and alteration to Nash Road to bring road directly through the site.

* Closure of Nash Road arm of Coffin House Corner, meaning Nash Road only links to Empire Terrace and not junction with Shottendane and Hartsdown Road, with changes to signalling.

* Change in road layout at Manston Road/Shottendane Road junction.

In the design document, it states: “The link between Nash Road and Manston Road will result in the western section of Nash Road being “closed off” as a through route. The benefits this will achieve for the operation of the Coffin House Corner traffic lights is significant and this will also allow safer connectivity to the school from the school catchment area to the north of Nash Road which could help to encourage more walking and cycling by parents and children. The “closed off” section of the highway could also be used as an alternative dropping off area which would not cause disruption to the highway network given that this highway in the future would not be a through route.”

The development would be adjacent to the Grade II* listed Salmestone Grange, which is a Scheduled Ancient Monument.


The proposals have provoked 27 letters of objection to Thanet council. Among those against the plans are Manston Parish Council and  Margate Civic Society.

But planning committee members at a meeting last night (August 16) agreed to delegate the decision to officers. The planning officer attached to the case has recommended approval, saying: ““The provision of 250 dwellings would make a significant contribution to the District’s housing supply, supporting economic and social dimensions of sustainable development, with employment provided through construction. All requests for social contributions towards education and social care have been agreed by the applicant, and 30% on-site affordable housing. This attaches significant weight in favour of the application due to these social and economic benefits.”

‘Bad feeling’

Craig Solly, from the Birchington Local Plan Group, said: “The bad feeling was very apparent on the planning application, the Chairman was close to clearing the public gallery.

Image Google Maps

“The planning application is to build a new roundabout by St Gregory’s school and change the layout of the junction of Manston Road and Shottendane Road, and to close Nash Road at Salmstone Grange.

“People who drive down Shottendane Road will now have to wait because a give way will  give priority to the traffic from Westwood and Manston Road. Of course this is the road which Birchington and Westgate residents use to go to Margate.
“The Thanet Transport Strategy was mentioned and this has not been open to public consultation, because it is not ready yet.

“Our independent ward councillor Cllr Brimm spoke in favour of the residents objection, and the public speakers were excellent.

“Keith Coleman-Cooke, Sam Bambridge and Carol Partington rejected the application. They also asked questions to further understand the planning proposal.


“I am flabberghasted by the other members who did not ask questions and just by default took the officers recommendation. My question is, why did they bother becoming a councillor?

“The Local Plan process is a farce, no public consultation on transport and an application goes through which is pivotal to the start of the inner link road. You can safely assume, no matter what a developer submits it will be approved without question. This does not bode well for the future of North Thanet and in Birchington.

“I do recall a council Leader stating in front of his planning officer that he would not approve housing if the funding for roads was not viable. I get a feeling that after (last night’s) circus performance that was just someone uttering words.

“It certainly seems in just after 2 years, we have a council which is as pointless as the previous administration, and the administration before that, and infinitum.”


  1. When will councillors wake up and have a vote of no confidence and request that Thanet council be placed in special measures.

  2. Way too early to make any decisions, either way! I am sure there will be much more said and done, before the correct procedure is adhered to. However, any criticism is rather ‘stupid’ at this point. Progress in Thanet has to come, and it will not please everybody. Especially nimby’s. The noise from the gallery was uncalled for. Even Cllr Edwards abstained from voting fore or against (his Ward) in an attempt to cool the Gallery down. Compromises will have to be made on both sides. The new main road from Birchington to Margate has been in development for 10 years, and one day it will have to happen sooner, rather than later!

  3. Well, if roads will be closed to make getting from A to B more difficult then this should not go ahead. There is already chaos and traffic jams in the area and closing access to a through road would just make things worse than it already is.
    Yes, we need more houses but not 250 on tight busy roads in this area. There is supposed to be a move towards building eco-friendly and affordable homes at Manston where there is at least easier access on to the main routes. Thanet needs better roads that can handle much more traffic before great estates of housing is thrust upon it. It took me over half an hour from Cliftonville through Margate to Victoria traffic lights and out through Coffin Corner onto the Manston road the other evening which is far too long. This plan will only make things worse.

  4. Many, many ignorant comments being made. House prices are at a ridiculous level in comparison to earnings because successive governments have failed to build enough housing. I’m not a Tory voter but, to their credit, this government has grasped the nettle and has set compulsory targets for councils to build more housing. Those people claiming that more housing isn’t needed are living in cloud-cuckoo-land. The council has control over where these houses will go, but to exercise that control they must adopt the new local plan, setting out clearly where the housing will go. Until they do that the developers will be able to appeal decisions against them. For this reason the officers are not able to recommend anything other than acceptance. It’s important that people recognise that the problem here is not the officers; it’s the councillors. They (all parties) have failed to agree a new local plan and it is now 6 years overdue. In the absence of a valid local plan their objections to any particular housing development are likely to be overruled on appeal.

Comments are closed.